Gazprom’s $3-bln platform

Offshore oil production is less than 3% of Russia’s total but Russia has grandiose plans for oil and gas production in the Arctic ocean as well as the Black Sea and the Far Eastern seas. ExxonMobil’s and Shell/s experience operating Sakhalin’s offshore fields seems to position them as the most logical choices for Rosneft/Gazprom’s partners in the Arctic.

But what does Gazprom’s Prirazlomnaya platform have to do with all this?

It’s a long story, but to make it short, the platform took around 15 years to build at the SevMash plant in Severodvinsk near Arkhangelsk. Apparently, Gazprom changed the specifications once or twice so the platform had to be redesigned. Eventually it became a hybrid: on top of the Russian-made lower deck, they installed a section of an old, out of service North Sea platform. According to Vladimir Milov (link in Russian), it cost about $3 bln to build and install.

But how much will the next Russian Arctic platform cost and how long will it take to build?

One comment

  1. […] Lukoil’s achievement is building offshore operations is admirable for a company with zero initial experience but the Sakhalin projects are more relevant to the Russian Arctic. The northeast of Sakhalin has a subarctic climate despite the low latitude, with very cold winters and strong winds and storms. One would think that ExxonMobil’s and Shell’s Sakhalin experience will be indispensable for any new offshore project in the Arctic. ExxonMobil is also Rosneft’s No. 1 partner in future Arctic efforts.But where does that Gazprom platform that Greenpeace is so allergic to, Prirazlomnaya, fit in this picture? — To be continued. […]

Comments are closed.

Discover more from Winterings in Trans-Scythia

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading